Any government bureaucracy regardless of its origin will by its nature expand and seek power. Today the Judiciary is expanding its power to the point that it is accountable to no one but itself. Such power is contrary to the constitution that recognizes that power is derived from the people. Absolute Judicial Immunity is the legal concept that allows judges to abuse the powers granted by the people. In seeking power the judiciary has created labor unions known as bar associations that are closed shops open only to members. These bar associations are given the authority to discipline judges and their members. These commissions are secretive and not accountable to the people. Organizations such as Jail 4 Judges have started to fight back in an attempt to hold judges accountable. This whole argument is not confined to judges. Judges have granted absolute immunity to prosecutors, clerks and have severely limited liability of police and public officials in general. This cannot stand!
“Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Great men are almost always bad men.”
~ Lord Acton, in a letter to Bishop Mandell Creighton, 1887.
Ninth Circuit Rules Schools Can Ban Flag Tshirts for Safety Reasons
Supreme Court to Define Term “Bear Arms”
EPA in an Administrative Decision Takes Land Away from Wyoming
Supreme Court to Hear Recess Appointment Case
There is no one left to blame – but the judges/judiciary.
Liberty & Truth require constant vigilance. GLZ.
GRIFFIN’s SCALE of JUSTICE
When is a conflict a conflict?
The Washington State Patrol and I have a difference of Opinion. Following is an Issue of difference,
You be the Judge.
Short summary: March the 23, 20111filed a complaint against a WSP officer, named Richard Taylor. I was interviewed by two WSP officers, a Lt Wiley, and a Sgt. Ken DeMeMello. About half way through the interview I discovered that Sgt DeMello was also the supervisor over the officer of my complaint, Richard Taylor. And also Sgt DeMellow was involved in my complaint. This was immediately brought to Lt. Wileys attention as a conflict. In about 2 weeks I received a letter from a WSP Captain who stated that their review showed that Officer Taylor followed his training,and the regulations of that department. Case closed. I pursued this for three years, finally after filing a Public Records Request I
received more than 160 pages of the investigation report. My Complaint was I claimed that Officer Taylor wrote or fabricated false reports, and lied under oath. Being that he took an oath to tell the truth. Following is a Paragraph of one page of Sgt DeMello’s investigation report. It was redacted in places. But due to the fact I have thousands of documented pages I can fill in the redacted words. And also the WSP must think a person filing a complaint and giving them the original pages they sent redacted wouldn’t keep the complaint documents after three years. WRONG.
INVESTIGATOR NOTE: Exhibit SA is a complete copy of the affidavit. The affidavit is a civil affidavit regarding the forfeiture of the Dodge pickup. The events are clear when read in their totality and accurately described in the affidavit. The events are these: Griffin was observed driving the white Dodge pickup to the deal on February 3, 2006. He was followed by surveillance to (redacted). Griffin
states on the recording that he left the methamphetamine on the (redacted) This is immediately relayed to (redacted) by phone. Griffin meets the CS for money and then followed the Cs back (redacted).
YOU WILL FIND THE REDACTED SPACES IN THE FACTS FOLLOWING
Now I will give the facts according to documented pages given or provided by the government. The foregoing affidavit was signed by Taylor and produced at the forfeiture hearing 9 months after the trial. My complaint was about the fact that Taylor lied. Some place in the following reports or testimony. The affidavit states,
On or about Feb.3, 2006, Griffin was observed driving this white Dodge pickup to the CS’s residence, dropping off methamphetamine, then meeting with the Cs for money. What Sgt DeMello did not disclose in this report is the following question of my complaint that no one seems to want to answer, First Report on this issue,
In Taylor’s report 2-3-2008 he writes “to the area of the CS’s residence”. Second is Taylors Testimony at a the Grand Jury Indictment March 21, 2006, which reads “surveillance units followed Mr. Griffin over to the confidential informants residence anyway and then away from there to another parking lot.” Third. Sgt. DeMello did not mention at the Trial, Taylor testified that no agent saw Griffin at the CS’s residence. Fourth, Demello did not mention that the lead surveillance
units on Mr. Griffin, which is DEA agent Hanten ,and two other DEA units in a 25 mph zone and in less than 9 blocks LOST surveillance. And never saw Griffin at
the CS residence. Fifth, and even more important, Taylor testified that he believed an agent named Zidack was riding with him. Hanten testified that Zidack was one of the three units that had Griffin under surveillance and lost Griffin.
Even worse. In Taylors report where he lists the officers involved that day. Zidack was not even working, but guess who was. Sgt Ken DeMello Now is this a conflict or not.
As to the wired Tape recording transcripts. DeMello wants to say the transcripts say, “Griffin said he put the drugs on the back porch” Not True. Griffin said “there on the pack porch.” It was the CS “Confidential Source” (Bill Ward) that stated Griffin said he put them on the porch. At Trial Griffin testified how he knew where the drugs were. And it involved the CS’s ex-girlfriend who was fighting with Bill Ward. Make a note. After the trial I contacted the girlfriend’s mother and ask how Bill Ward knew that a passenger in Bill wards girlfriend car that morning before the deal as DeMello state. Was Shawnee Stroud. The Girlfriend (Jeannie Blake) according to the mother had went to see Bill Ward that morning. So with this being said, and I have my documents to prove what I have written. Yes I am the father of the defendant.
You be the Judge
I can be contacted by writing to Jim Griffin, 1251 Ash. Clarkston Washington, 99403 as I always state. You don’t get a fox to guard a hen house.
Department of Justice Reading Room
Equal Justice Foundation
Link to Free Legal Research
Google Scholar Free Case law Research
Justia Legal Research
Media Law Research
National Motorist Assn. Fight Traffic Tickets
US Supreme Court